The News & Observer
May 26, 1995
Tax breaks prompt anti-foreign ads
Ken Berger, The Associated Press
Copyright © 1995, The News & Observer
The debate over incentives to attract industry has
taken a nasty tone in Alabama, where a new radio ad refers to World War
II in denouncing tax breaks for German and Japanese companies.Used with permission.
The 60-second ad, which begins, "I thought we won the war,"
is part of a backlash against a state tax incentive law that helped lure
Mercedes-Benz to Alabama last year and may help attract a steel company
partly owned by Sumitomo of Japan.
"It's probably the biggest corporate welfare plan we've ever had
in the state of Alabama," said Mark Williams, director of the Alabama
State Employees Association, which is running the ad.
The practice of wooing industry is alive and well in many other states,
and so is the debate over whether financial giveaways are worth their economic
Republican Gov. Fob James has complained that the state, under his Democratic
predecessor, gave away too much to land Mercedes. The German automaker was
promised some $253 million in incentives and tax breaks. Some incentives
were one-time-only, such as $90 million to train workers, but other tax
breaks were made part of Alabama law to attract other businesses.
Among those that may reap the benefits is Trico Steel, a limited partnership
owned by Sumitomo, British Steel and LTV of America.
The possibility of Trico's getting tax breaks has offended competing
steel companies already located in Birmingham and Gadsden.
Mark Tomasch, Trico's communications director, said the negative ads
will not affect its selection of a plant site.
Mercedes spokeswoman Linda Paulmeno said the automaker felt welcome
in the state and wasn't bothered by the ad.
James has promised to honor the Mercedes deal and proposed a $145 million
bond issue to help pay for it. To pay off the bonds, James has proposed
taking $13 million a year for 30 years from earnings on Alabama's oil lease
trust fund - money that normally goes to pay state employees and state government
"Now I hear the Legislature and governor are giving our state's
trust fund money to German and Japanese companies to get them to bring their
factories to Alabama," says the speaker in the new ad. "Our companies
are going to be forced to lay off people so these foreign companies can
take our money back to their people with our tax dollars. I'm mad about
"That money ought to be used to take care of our elderly, our poor
and to keep prisoners locked up."
States have long been trying to outdo one another to attract big business.
Amarillo, Texas, is offering some $8 million in incentives to about 1,300
companies if they promise to create 700 jobs. St. Louis, Mo., has offered
the Los Angeles Rams an economic development package estimated to cost state
and local taxpayers as much as $720 million.
Mercedes looked at 170 sites in 30 states, including North Carolina,
before selecting the farming community of Vance in north-central Alabama.
The company is building a $300 million plant that will employ about 1,500
workers by the time it starts producing its sport-utility vehicle in 1997.
Paulmeno said Alabama will be cashing dividends from that decision for
years in the form of jobs, tax revenue and prestige. "To reap the rewards,"
she said, "you have to make an investment."
Critics say giveaways don't always add up.
Art Rolnick, a top official at the Federal Reserve Bank in Minneapolis,
was co-author of a March article that urged states to stop pouring tax dollars
into projects whose economic benefits may be overstated. He called the practice
"inconsistent with good economics."
Williams said he wants to wake lawmakers up to incentives' costs.
"It's just a massive giveaway," he said.
All rights reserved. No part of this article may be
reproduced, translated, or transmitted in any form or by any means without
permission in writing from The News & Observer.
Copyright © 1995, The News & Observer.
| Click here to go to The News & Observer homepage. |
| Case Home
| Out-Box |