Government
Reform, Diné Appropriate Government, Local
Governance Projects
The Office of Navajo Government Development
Navajo Nation (Window Rock, Arizona)
Contact:
Marlon Stevens, Executive Director
Office of Navajo Government Development
The Navajo Nation
PO Box 220, Window Rock, Arizona 86515
Tel: (928) 871-7161
Recognizing the demand for a government
that would respond to the unique needs of the
Diné people, the Navajo Nation created
the Commission on Navajo Government Development
and its administrative arm, the Office of Navajo
Government Development, in 1989. With the sole
responsibility of undertaking government reform,
the Commission and Office have educated the
Navajo population on governmental issues and
increased local participation in governance
and the government reform process. These organizations
are unique—and uniquely successful—in
institutionalizing the process for undertaking
on-going government reform in Indian Country.
With a population of approximately 225,000, the Navajo Nation is the largest
Indian nation in the United States. It spans 17.5 million acres and stretches
across northwest New Mexico, northeast Arizona, and southeast Utah. Traditionally,
Navajo political decision making took place at a local level with bands of
ten to forty families comprising political units. In the early 1920s, however,
outside oil interests—eager to tap the Navajo Nation’s potential
energy riches—urged the US Department of the Interior to authorize
the establishment of a centralized Navajo Tribal Council for the purpose
of approving oil leases. In 1923, the Interior Department created the Navajo
Tribal Council, the first body in Navajo history organized to act on behalf
of the entire Nation. In 1989, the Nation endured a nationally publicized
standoff between Council members supporting and opposing the Council’s
all-powerful chairman. In the aftermath of the turmoil and through a series
of amendments to Title 2 of its Governing Code, the Nation reorganized its
government into three branches and renamed the “Navajo Tribal Council” the “Navajo
Nation Council.” These amendments were viewed as a temporary measure
intended to take place concurrently with a reform effort to reexamine the
basic governing structure of the Nation. However, this reform did not take
place, nor did the Navajo people have the opportunity to ratify the Title
2 amendments at a referendum. Because the Navajo people never consented to
the establishment of the Council as the governing body in 1923 and did not
have the opportunity to ratify the Title 2 amendments in 1989, there has
long been a broad desire among the Navajo people to reform their government.
While additional reform was not forthcoming
in 1989, the Navajo Nation Council did create
the means for it by establishing the Commission
on Navajo Government Development and its administrative
arm, the Office of Navajo Government Development.
The Commission and Office are the only permanent
government entities in Indian Country specifically
charged with developing and helping to implement
government reform on an on-going basis. The Commission
on Navajo Government Development, which by statute,
includes representatives from the five Navajo
agencies (political subdivisions of the Nation),
the three central government branches (the executive,
legislative, and judicial branches), the Women’s
Commission, and Diné College, as well
as a medicine man and a graduate school student,
is designed to solicit and address Navajo attitudes
towards government and government reform. All
of the representatives are nominated by their
respective entities and then confirmed by the
Navajo Nation Council to serve a term of two
years, with the exception of the medicine man
and the five agency representatives, who serve
terms of four years. The Office of Navajo Government
Development, staffed by lawyers and policy professionals,
is designed to implement the recommendations
and advice of the Commission. Working with the
Navajo people, the Commission and Office review
and evaluate existing Navajo Nation government
institutions and develop recommendations for
government reforms for consideration and adoption
by the Nation. Much of the Commission and Office’s
work is driven by grassroots outreach and information
gathering efforts. To date, the groups’ work
has included reforms in executive branch policy,
a review of the Navajo Nation Council’s
organization and procedure, a review of aspects
of the Local Governance Act, and a Nation-wide
convention and referendum on further changes
to the Nation’s Code. The comprehensiveness
of this approach is unique in Indian Country.
Notably, the Commission and Office have been successful in working with the
Navajo people to develop culturally appropriate government reforms. The Commission
and Office were significantly involved in conceptualizing and drafting the
Local Governance Act (LGA) of 1998, which devolves powers from the central
Navajo Nation Council to local government units, the 110 chapters. The LGA
allows chapters that are governance-certified by the Navajo Nation Council
to acquire, sell, and lease property and issue property-use permits; enter
into contracts for the provision of goods and services; enter into intergovernmental
agreements with federal, state, and tribal entities; and adopt ordinances
relating to land use planning, taxing, alternative governance models, and
zoning. The Commission and Office’s determination to return power to
local government units as the Navajo people desired means not only that they
worked for the passage of the LGA, but that they have assisted chapters in
obtaining governance certification. Recognizing that many chapters had applied
for certification but that several years after the Act’s passage only
a few had gained full LGA status, the Commission and Office sought and obtained
grant funds to initiate the Land Use Planning component of the Act. The Land
Use Planning Project allows chapters to hire Navajo consultants to develop
land use plans, which will move them closer to governance certification.
A majority of the plans will be complete by the end of fiscal year 2002.
While working with local chapters to implement
the LGA, the Commission and Office discovered
pervasive discontent with the Nation’s
central government, especially the Navajo Nation
Council. Determined to transform this discontent
into proposed amendments for central governmental
reform, the Commission and Office initiated the
Government Reform Project. Throughout 2001, the
Commission and Office conducted a series of regional
summits in order to solicit the input of the
Navajo people on governmental reform. These summits
were crucial in clarifying Navajo citizens’ demands
for a government consistent with their culture
and tradition. In 2002, the Commission and Office
organized this input into proposed amendments
to the Navajo Nation Code and organized a convention
to vote on the proposed amendments. Having formalized
a process by which to elect convention delegates,
the Commission and Office held the Statutory
Reform Convention in May 2002. Delegates from
109 of the 110 chapters attended the Convention
and approved twenty-nine proposed amendments.
If adopted by the Navajo Nation Council, the
amendments will result in a more effective and
culturally appropriate Navajo government.
Two strategies have enabled the Commission on
Navajo Government Development and the Office
of Navajo Government Development to work towards
a more culturally appropriate form of Navajo
government that is free from federally imposed
structures and regulations. First, the Commission
and Office have actively involved the Navajo
people in government reform. The Commission and
Office continually work to educate the Navajo
citizenry about the history, structure, and purpose
of their government. They have published a highly
readable and readily available brochure on tribal
governance, Handbook on Navajo Nation Government,
as well as a report, Engaging the Navajo People
in the Process of Government Reform, which details
the strengths and weaknesses of the existing
Navajo government and recommends strategies for
individual involvement in the reform effort.
The Commission and Office also have gone to great
lengths to hear the voice of the people on government
reform. Their Government Reform Project began
with a series of public hearings, workshops,
and agency summits designed to solicit the opinions
of Navajo citizens. While a reform effort rarely
reaches all people, the Government Reform Project’s
public hearings have set a very high standard,
and the Commission and Office continue to meet
regularly with schools, youth and elder groups,
business leaders, veterans, and current US military
personnel. To close the circle of communication
and outreach, the Commission and Office keep
citizens informed of progress on the Government
Reform Project through the regular publication
of newspaper-like updates on summit and convention
issues and findings.
Second, the Commission and Office have established
a helpful web of working relationships within
the Navajo Nation government. The Commission
and Office maintain strong ties to the Navajo
Nation Executive Branch, the Navajo Nation Council,
the five regional agencies, and the 110 local
chapters. These relationships highlight the Commission
and Office’s unique model of leveraging
the legal authority and funding of a government
to turn grassroots citizens’ concerns into
government reforms. Critically, while the Office
is technically a part of the legislative branch,
the Commission and Office’s careful attention
to their relationship with the Navajo Nation
Council has increased their ability to independently
promote government reform. For example, in 2001,
the Navajo Nation Council asked the Commission
and Office to review the Council’s organization.
The resulting report led to many proposals to
improve Council efficiency, and convinced many
delegates of the Commission and Office’s
non-political agenda. Although the Commission
and Office might benefit from even greater independence,
their skill in maintaining working relationships
with the government institutions on which they
depend results in deliberate, productive reform
that makes the Navajo government increasingly
responsive to the Navajo people.
While many Indian Nations are making great strides
in government reform by means of constitutional
change, the Commission on Navajo Government Development
and the Office of Navajo Government Development
exemplify an innovative and different means of
reform—a permanent government institution
to work on fundamental, grassroots-driven governmental
change. The comprehensiveness of this approach
to producing a culturally appropriate form of
government is unique in Indian Country.
Lessons: