|
The working paper by Academic Dean and Professor Stephen Walt and Professor
John Mearsheimer presents a conspiratorial view of history in which the
Israel Lobby has a “stranglehold” on American foreign policy, the American
media, think tanks and academia. In his response, Professor Alan Dershowitz
demonstrates that the paper contains three types of major errors:
quotations are wrenched out of context, important facts are misstated or
omitted; and embarrassingly weak logic is employed. One of the authors of
this paper has acknowledged that “none of the evidence represents original
documentation or is derived from independent interviews.” In light of the
paper’s errors, and its admitted lack of originality, Dershowitz asks why
these professors would have chosen to publish a paper that does not meet
their usual scholarly standards, especially given the risk – that should
have been obvious to “realists” - that recycling these charges under their
imprimatur of prominent authors would be featured, as they have been, on
extremist websites. Dershowitz questions the authors claims that people who
support Israel do not want “an open debate on issues involving Israel.” He
renews his challenge to debate the issues.
|