|
Learning to Manage Global Environmental Risks
Volume 2: A Functional Analysis of Social
Responses to Climate Change, Ozone Depletion, and Acid Rain
The Social Learning Group
The MIT Press, 2001
Part III: Studies of Management Functions Chapter 19
Implementation
in the Management of
Global Environmental Risks
Rodney Dobell with Justin Longo, Jeannine
Cavender-Bares, William C. Clark, Nancy M. Dickson, Gerda Dinkelman,
Adam Fenech, Peter M. Haas, Jill Jäger, Ruud Pleune, Ferenc L. Tóth,
Miranda A. Schreurs, and Josee van Eijndhoven
| 19.1 |
Introduction |
| 19.2 |
The Empirical Record and Some General
Patterns |
| 19.2.1 |
The Data |
| 19.2.2 |
Selection of Instruments |
| 19.2.3 |
The Three Cases Compared |
| 19.2.4 |
The Record Overall |
| 19.3 |
Seven Stories |
| 19.3.1 |
Capacity to Address Air Pollution and
Acidifying Deposition: Clean Air Acts |
| 19.3.2 |
Banning Chlorofluorocarbons |
| 19.3.3 |
Offsetting Emissions: Carbon Sequestration |
| 19.3.4 |
Economic Instruments: Taxes for Environmental
Purposes |
| 19.3.5 |
Economic Instruments: Emissions Permit Trading |
| 19.3.6 |
Voluntary Initiatives and “Challenge”
Arrangements
|
| 19.3.7 |
International Agreements:
Covenants without Sanctions by a Central Authority |
| 19.4 |
Did the Performance of the
Implementation Function Improve?
|
| 19.4.1 |
Criteria to Assess Improvement
|
| 19.4.2 |
Explanations for Improvements
|
| 19.5 |
Conclusions
|
| 19.5.1 |
Evolution in the Implementation
Function is Evident
|
| 19.5.2 |
An Orderly Flow Emerges
|
| 19.5.3 |
Convergence toward Adaptive
Learning and Focus on Commitment can be Claimed
|
| Appendix 19A |
Acronyms
Notes
References
|
| Table 19.1 |
Actions and instruments
|
Return to top
Previous Chapter | Full Book Table of
Contents | Next Chapter
Return to Social
Learning Book Home
|