Big Little Election Lies: Cynical and Credulous Evaluations of Electoral Fraud

This article examines how citizens evaluate claims of electoral fraud and election integrity in different political systems. Norris distinguishes between cynical citizens who distrust trustworthy elections and credulous citizens who place excessive confidence in flawed electoral processes. Drawing on comparative evidence, the study argues that public perceptions of electoral integrity are shaped by the information environment, regime type, and exposure to misinformation. The paper explores how false claims about electoral fraud can erode democratic legitimacy and public trust, while also emphasizing the risks posed by uncritical acceptance of manipulated or unfair elections.