By Raul Duarte
How do social structures, such as age set and kin-based societies, influence economic interactions and the effectiveness of development policies in East Africa?
CID faculty affiliate Awa Ambra Seck and co-author Jacob Moscona investigate this question in their recent paper entitled Age Set vs. Kin: Culture and Financial Ties in East Africa. This paper investigates how different social structures—age set versus kin-based—affect economic interactions and policy impacts in East Africa, particularly focusing on cash transfer and pension programs in Kenya and Uganda. Age sets are cohorts of individuals who are initiated into adulthood together, forming lifelong social and economic bonds, whereas kin-based societies emphasize extended family ties across generations.
Key Findings:
- Redistribution in Age Set vs. Kin-Based Societies: In age set societies, within-cohort economic support is stronger, leading to consumption spillovers among age mates, but no redistribution across family generations. In kin-based societies, resources are shared within families, but there is little intra-cohort support.
- In age set societies, within-cohort economic ties prevail over family ties, leading to stronger consumption spillovers among age mates than among clan members. Conversely, in kin-based societies, within-family economic ties prevail over within-cohort ties.
- Cash Transfer Experiment (Kenya): A randomized cash transfer experiment in Northern Kenya showed that in age set societies, treated cohort members increased consumption spending for their age-mates by 13% of the transfer amount, while in kin-based societies, redistribution occurred within extended families.
- Pension Program (Uganda): Uganda’s pension program improved child nutrition significantly in kin-based societies, where grandparents invested in younger generations. In age set societies, however, the pension had no impact on child nutrition, indicating weaker intergenerational financial ties.
Impact and Relevance:
The study highlights the importance of understanding local social structures in shaping economic interactions and the effectiveness of development policies. In age set societies (which the authors estimate encompass over 200 million people), strong bonds within the cohort generate horizontal economic ties, making policies that focus on individual transfers more likely to result in spillovers within that age group. However, the lower importance of intergenerational financial ties suggests that age set societies might struggle with life-cycle consumption smoothing, potentially leaving vulnerable groups—such as children and the elderly—without adequate support.
In contrast, kin-based societies, which emphasize family and generational support, respond differently to public policies like pensions or cash transfers. In these societies, financial resources are more likely to flow across generations, ensuring that benefits extend to younger or more vulnerable family members. For example, Uganda’s pension program significantly improved child nutrition in kin-based societies but had no effect in age set societies, underscoring how social structure can amplify or constrain the impact of redistributive policies.
This research has crucial implications for policymakers in developing countries and beyond. Many anti-poverty programs and social safety nets are designed with an implicit assumption that financial transfers will benefit the entire household or community. However, this study demonstrates that the success of such programs depends heavily on the underlying social fabric. Policymakers must consider whether a society is more age or kinship-oriented when designing interventions. In age set societies, direct support for vulnerable age groups—such as children or the elderly—might be necessary to compensate for the lack of family-based redistribution. Conversely, in kin-based societies, policies can leverage strong intergenerational ties to achieve a broader impact.
This research also speaks to broader concerns about inequality and resilience. In age set societies, individuals at low-earning stages of the life cycle may have fewer resources to rely on, potentially exacerbating inequality across age groups. Kin-based societies may mitigate such risks but could foster inequality across extended families or clans. By revealing these dynamics, the study offers insights into how different social structures influence not only economic outcomes but also social cohesion and inequality in vulnerable communities.
Watch an animated video representation of this research paper by Econimate.
CID Faculty Affiliate Author
Awa Ambra Seck
Awa Ambra Seck is an assistant professor in the Business, Government, and the International Economy unit at Harvard Business School and a Research Affiliate at LEAP and CID. Her work is at the intersection of development economics, economic history, and political economy. She focuses on Africa and she studies how colonial policies persisted and shaped current economic development, with a focus on emigration patterns, as well as how cultural traits and economics intertwine.
Photo by Bailey Torres via Unsplash
The Confidence Factor: How Our Beliefs Shape Attitudes Towards Fairness and Redistribution
By Raphaelle Aulagnon & Timm Gries