Abstract

Representative bureaucracy examines how identity impacts bureaucratic decision-making. Under certain circumstances, identity congruence between government officials and citizens will result in positive outcomes. This article explores how representative bureaucracy literature studies the effects of gender identity and matching. Although studies demonstrate that context and organizational environment impact identity, scholars don’t systematically analyze how outcomes are affected by gender, rely predominantly on binary gender variables, seldom acknowledge organizations as masculine spaces, and don’t problematize masculinity. Using critical gender theory, we offer new proposals for how to expand our understanding of institutionalized gender norms as they relate to public sector decisions.

Citations

Kennedy, Alexis R., Sebawit G. Bishu, and Nuri Heckler. “Feminism, Masculinity, and Active Representation: A Gender Analysis of Representative Bureaucracy”. SAGE Journals (2019). Web.  
?>