This summer, HKS students put their policy skills to work across sectors, from technology and AI to state and local government, climate and clean energy, and community engagement. 

In this edition of Field Notes, Max Glanville MPA/ID 2027, Vineet Kumar MPP 2027, and Alida Monaco MPP 2027 reflect on their summer internship experiences in climate and clean energy—the roles they played on their teams, projects they took on, challenges encountered, and lessons they’re bringing back to the HKS campus this fall. 

—

Max Glanville MPA/ID 2027

Climate analyst intern, Suyana

Max Glanville headshot

Tell us a bit about your background. What drew you to climate and clean energy before HKS?

I started my career in the financial markets group at the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA). I then worked in the Australian Treasury’s macroeconomic analysis and policy department before returning to the RBA to join its note issue department.

I developed an interest in climate and clean energy while working as a policy analyst in the chief economist’s office at the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). At the OECD, we talked a lot about the “four Ds” shaping the policy landscape: digitalization, demographics, deglobalization, and decarbonization. The fourth D—decarbonization—sparked my interest in climate work. 

The OECD was doing interesting research on the effectiveness of mitigation policies, the need for adaptation frameworks, the effects of climate change on productivity, and countries’ ability to meet decarbonization targets under different policy scenarios. This work was so fascinating that it inspired me to pursue work in climate and clean energy.   

Where did you spend your summer, and what was your role?

I spent the summer at Suyana, whose mission is to bridge the insurance gap in Latin America by providing coverage to people and businesses that lack access to traditional insurance or cannot afford it.

As a climate analyst intern, I worked on two work streams. First, I analyzed insurance products that protect Colombian rice farmers against excess or insufficient rainfall. Specifically, I investigated the basis risk associated with these products—the risk that an insurance product pays out when the insured has not experienced a loss, or fails to pay when a loss happens.

Second, I worked on business strategy, including Suyana’s application to obtain delegated underwriting authority from an insurance carrier—the right to bind clients to insurance products on the carrier’s behalf. 

What kind of work did you do? Tell us about a project you’re especially proud of. 

I led the development of a business strategy to support Suyana’s transformation from a calculating agent to a managing general agent. Suyana currently designs insurance products and licenses or sells them to carriers. Its next step is to become a managing general agent—a carrier gives Suyana authority to bind them to insurance contracts on the carrier’s behalf. 

This transformation would help Suyana stabilize its revenues and scale its business, giving more people and businesses across Latin America access to insurance. Working on the application made me feel that I was directly contributing to Suyana’s mission and driving it forward.

What was the biggest challenge—something you had to work through or rethink?

The biggest challenge was working through the statistical complexities of designing parametric insurance products. A central challenge in parametric insurance is basis risk—the difference between the losses estimated by an index and the losses actually experienced by the insured. 

Although solving basis risk was beyond the scope of my work, understanding its drivers was not. For example, in the case of Colombian rice farmers, we measured rainfall across 5-by-5-kilometer grid cells, but each farmer’s plot represented only a small portion of that area. When topography is complex and climate conditions vary within a grid cell, the average measurement can differ significantly from the rainfall at any one location.

These differences can be driven by localized weather patterns, altitude, proximity to waterways, wind patterns, and the technology used to measure rainfall. Understanding the issue was challenging, statistically and conceptually. 

Did anything from your HKS coursework click in an unexpected way?

Absolutely! ! I drew heavily on the concepts from Professor Dan Levy’s API-209: Advanced Quantitative Methods I: Description and Prediction course while working on a rainfall-related project.

For the Colombian rice farmers, we used CHIRPS, a dataset that measures aggregate rainfall across 5-by-5-kilometer grid cells. Because rainfall can vary within those cells, a farmer may experience more or less rain than the amount recorded for the cell as a whole.

We wanted to compare rainfall measurements at the grid-cell level with measurements from a weather station located at a specific point—for example, if a farmer lived next an existing in-situ weather station. We also calculated false-negative rates, drawing on the machine-learning classification concepts we studied in Professor Levy’s course.

The challenge was to balance false positives against false negatives. Farmers need to be properly insured, but the product also cannot pay out too much such that carriers don’t want it on their balance sheet. Thank you, Professor Levy! 

What was a highlight—something fun, surprising, or memorable—from your summer?

Suyana is a Spanish-speaking organization, and I am a native English speaker who speaks a woefully small amount of French after living in Paris for two years. So, I spent some of the summer trying to learn some Spanish. 

Although I would not say, “Hablo español,” I would say: “Soy Max. Hablo un poquito de español. Vamos!”

 

Vineet Kumar MPP 2027

Intern, Punjab State Warehouse Corporation

Vineet Kumar headshotTell us a bit about your background. What drew you to climate and clean energy before HKS? 

Before coming to HKS, I worked for the state of Punjab for 12 years in a variety of administrative roles. Punjab has faced severe environmental crises for decades as a result of intensive monocropping. It has the highest rate of groundwater overexploitation in India—four out of five wells are overexploited, with groundwater extraction far exceeding the rate of natural recharge. Water tables are falling by several meters each year, while the intensive use of fertilizers and pesticides is depleting soil health.

Where did you spend your summer, and what was your role? 

I interned at the Punjab State Warehouse Corporation, a state agency responsible for grain storage and procurement. The corporation plays a central role in implementing India’s Minimum Support Price (MSP) system for rice and wheat. Specifically, I conducted research on ways to diversify Punjab’s cropping patterns toward more climate-resilient crops and reviewed the state’s procurement infrastructure and operations.

What kind of work did you do? Tell us about a project you’re especially proud of. 

My work included quantitative analysis of agricultural and procurement data, field visits to farming communities and grain procurement centers, and consultations with farmers, government officials, and subject-matter experts on agriculture, storage, and market linkages. 

I focused on how procurement price signals of specific crops influence farmers’ cropping decisions and on the economic conditions that could make diversification away from paddy more attractive to the farmers. I’m especially proud of developing a price-signal analysis for alternative crops. The analysis examined factors, including input prices, storage infrastructure, and market linkages to inform recommendations on minimum support price (MSP) support, procurement, and storage. 

What was the biggest challenge—something you had to work through or rethink? 

Resisting the urge to treat this purely as a technical problem. At its core, the issue is institutional and systemic. 

All stakeholders—including government, farmers, and the broader public—understand the consequences of Punjab’s unsustainable paddy and wheat monocropping, including alarming groundwater depletion, air pollution, and deteriorating soil health. Yet sustainable agricultural practices have not taken holder despite the state’s efforts. 

The missing link is an incentive structure that changes farmer behavior without imposing additional costs on smallholders, who are behaving rationally within the existing MSP system. I often found myself thinking of policy proposals without fully considering the perspective of a rational farmer or the political and administrative realities on the ground. Spending time at procurement centers and speaking directly with farmers forced me to rethink that approach.

Farmers aren’t resisting diversification for obscure reasons. They are responding predictably to the price guarantees, lower risk, and market access that alternative crops currently lack. I had to shift my thinking to see the need for a coordinated set of procurement and MSP reforms to address these incentives.  

Did anything from your HKS coursework click in an unexpected way? 

Yes, concepts API-111: Microeconomic Theory 1, API-501: Policy Design and Delivery, API-303: Game Theory and Strategic Decisions, and IGA-109: Negotiation and Diplomacy shaped my analysis of policies and stakeholder interactions.

The most important insight that emerged was the need to design policies that are compatible with the interests of all stakeholders. The goal is to create an equitable system in which farmers, acting in their own self-interest, also produce the outcomes society needs. 

What was a highlight—something fun, surprising, or memorable—from your summer? 

My conversations  with farming communities were a constant source of insight. After I explained climate change and the economic and environmental benefits of crop diversification, one farmer solemnly told me he didn't know the government was serious about addressing the state’s agricultural challenges or that it viewed crop diversification as a genuine solution.

He also said candidly that farmers could not bear the burden of environmental sustainability alone. It was a powerful reminder that farmers are asking the government to trust them—and to meet them halfway. 

 

Alida Monaco MPP 2027

Summer Graduate Fellow, Chicago Department of Environment

Alida Monaco headshotTell us a bit about your background. What drew you to climate and clean energy before HKS?

I studied environmental science as an undergraduate and worked in climate and clean energy for five years before coming to HKS. My passion for climate justice grew from experiencing the effects of Hurricane Sandy on my New York City neighborhood as a child. When I learned climate change was making hurricanes stronger and more frequent, I decided to dedicate my career to fighting the climate crisis.

Where did you spend your summer, and what was your role?

I worked as a Summer Graduate Fellow with the Chicago Department of Environment. My work included crafting policy options to regulate data centers, researching renewable energy deployment in Chicago, recommending updates to modernize the Chicago Municipal Code, and helping plan events for Chicago Climate Week. 

What kind of work did you do? Tell us about a project you’re especially proud of.

One project I am especially proud of is an operational assessment survey that I designed and deployed across the Department of Environment. Based on the results, I identified five  actionable steps that DOE leadership could take to improve the resolution of residents’ 3-1-1 complaints and strengthen internal operations.

What was the biggest challenge—something you had to work through or rethink?

The biggest challenge was balancing the urgent tasks that local government must address every day with the time needed for long-term strategy work and evaluating operational effectiveness.

Did anything from your HKS coursework click in an unexpected way?

At HKS, we often discuss the different forms of power in the public sector and how “strange bedfellow” coalitions can help create durable policy. That idea came to life in a real way over the summer in municipal government. Much of the city’s work depends on partnerships with nonprofits and local businesses—organizations that may not always appear to share the DOE’s goals but can be essential to advancing them.

What was a highlight—something fun, surprising, or memorable—from your summer?

As part of the mayor’s public budget engagement series, I attended a budget listening session with Chicago youth to hear what they value and how they would like the city to invest public funds. 

Many teenagers spoke about the increased flooding caused by heavier rainstorms and called for greater investment in green spaces and trash collection. It was encouraging to hear young people connect climate impacts in their communities with concrete priorities.  


Field Notes brings you conversations with HKS students who spent their summer on the front lines of issues shaping public life today. Through firsthand Q&As, students shared the work, challenges, and moments that stuck with them—across technology and artificial intelligence, state and local government, climate and clean energy, and community engagement.

Images courtesy of Max Glanville, Vineet Kumar, and Alida Monaco.

Read Next Post
View All Blog Posts