26th November 2025
Abstract
This article compares cradle-to-grave (life-cycle) Energy Return on Investment (EROI) and greenhouse-gas (GHG) intensity for switchgrass (a perennial cellulosic bioenergy crop) and conventional fossil fuels (coal, natural gas, and oil products). It explains the lifecycle stages included in cradle-to-grave assessments, summarizes the main processes that drive EROI and GHG outcomes for each fuel pathway, highlights practical challenges and benefits of using switchgrass, presents illustrative case studies (electricity from biomass vs. coal/gas, and cellulosic ethanol vs. gasoline), and concludes with implications for energy policy and research priorities. The goal is to give an accessible but scientifically grounded synthesis to help researchers, students, and policy makers compare these energy options on both energetic and climate-relevant grounds
Citation
Romer, Paul, Dani Rodrik, Daron Acemoglu, Douglass North, and Angus Deaton. "Comparative Cradle-to-Grave Energy Return on Investment (EROI) and GHG Intensity for Switchgrass and Fossil Fuels." 26th November 2025.