Annual Review of Political Science
Vol. 17, Pages 65-87
May 2014
Abstract
In recent years, there has been increasing interest in the potential of transparency-the provision of information to the public-to
improve governance in both developed and developing societies. In this
article, we characterize and assess the evolution of transparency from
an end in itself to a tool for resolving increasingly practical
concerns of governance and government performance. After delineating
four distinct varieties of transparency, we focus on the type that has
received the most rigorous empirical scrutiny from social
scientists-so-called 'transparency and accountability' (T/A)
interventions intended to improve the quality of public services and
governance in developing countries. T/A interventions have yielded
mixed results: some are highly successful; others appear to have little
impact. We develop a rubric of five ideal-typical 'worlds' facing
transparency that helps to account for this variation in outcomes.
Reform based on transparency can face obstacles of collective action,
political resistance, and long implementation chains. T/A interventions
are more likely to succeed in contextual 'worlds' with fewer of these
obstacles. We find that 16 experimental evaluations of T/A
interventions are largely consistent with the theoretical predictions
of our five-worlds rubric.
Citation
Stephen Kosack,and Archon Fung. "Does Transparency Improve Governance?" Annual Review of Political Science 17 (May 2014): 65-87.