Health Affairs
Vol. 32, Issue 7, Pages 1228-1235
July 2013
Abstract
With quality-of-care bonus
payments now available for Medicare Advantage health maintenance
organizations (HMOs) and for accountable care organizations in
traditional Medicare, the need to understand the relative quality of
care delivered to Medicare enrollees has increased. We compared the
quality of ambulatory care from 2003 through 2009 between beneficiaries
enrolled in Medicare Advantage HMOs and those enrolled in traditional
Medicare, and we assessed how the performance of various types of
Medicare HMOs differed from that of traditional Medicare for these same
measures. We found that beneficiaries in Medicare HMOs were
consistently more likely than those in traditional Medicare to receive
appropriate breast cancer screening, diabetes care, and cholesterol
testing for cardiovascular disease. We also found that Medicare HMO
physicians were rated less favorably by their patients than were
physicians in traditional Medicare in 2003; however, by 2009 the
opposite was true. Not-for-profit, larger, and older Medicare HMOs
performed consistently more favorably on clinical measures and ratings
of care than for-profit, smaller, and newer HMOs. Our results suggest
that the positive effects of more-integrated delivery systems on the
quality of ambulatory care in Medicare HMOs may outweigh the potential
incentives to restrict care under capitated payments.
Citation
Ayanian, John Z., Bruce E. Landon, Alan M. Zaslavsky, Robert C. Saunders, Robert C., Gregory L. Pawlson, and Joseph P. Newhouse. "Medicare Beneficiaries More Likely To Receive Appropriate Ambulatory Services In HMOs Than In Traditional Medicare." Health Affairs 32.7 (July 2013): 1228-1235.