HKS Authors

See citation below for complete author information.

Matthew W. Stirling, Jr. Professor of History and Social Policy

Abstract

Indeed, if we were drafting a constitution today, few people would even consider a presidential electoral system like the In a presidential election season, it seems obvious (yet again) that we should rewrite parts of Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution — so that we can dispense with the Electoral College and hold a national popular vote to choose our chief executive. Indeed, if we were drafting a constitution today, few people would even consider a presidential electoral system like the Electoral College. (Massachusetts Senator Charles Sumner, in the mid-19th century, characterized it as “artificial, cumbrous, radically defective and unrepublican.”) The concerns that prompted the Founding Fathers to adopt this system — a distrust of popular elections, worry that the people would be unfamiliar with national candidates, a desire to reinforce the great constitutional compromises between large states and small states, slave states and free states — have lost much of their salience since 1787.

Citation

Keyssar, Alexander. "Do Away With the Electoral College." New York Times, July 8, 2012.